Friday, December 5

Priti Patel probe: PM tried to interfere


 

 

Boris Johnson has been accused of trying and failing to interfere with the official inquiry into allegations of bullying by home secretary Priti Patel.

After refusing to sack Patel, despite a summary of the report released on Friday finding that her conduct amounted to behaviour that can be described as bullying, the PM is now facing allegations that he attempted to pressure his standards adviser into watering down his conclusion.

Downing Street has not denied suggestions that Johnson had approached Sir Alex Allan in a bid to tone down the report. The adviser quit on Friday when the Johnson overruled his conclusion that Patel breached the ministerial code with her behaviour towards staff, which Allan said included shouting and swearing.

Offering what she described as an unreserved, fulsome apology, Patel seized on the report’s finding that she received no feedback on the impact of her behaviour. But Sir Philip Rutnam, who quit as the Home Office’s permanent secretary after accusing Patel of a vicious and orchestrated briefing campaign against him, contested this.

He said she was advised not to shout and swear at staff within weeks of her appointment in 2019 and that he told her to treat staff with respect on a number of further occasions. Crucially, Rutnam also said he was not interviewed for the inquiry despite him having launched a constructive dismissal claim at an employment tribunal.

Meanwhile, The Times reported two unnamed senior Whitehall officials saying that the PM tried and failed to get Allan to tone down his report to find there was no clear evidence of bullying.

Johnson’s press secretary Allegra Stratton said: The prime minister does personally take these allegations exceedingly seriously. He loathes bullying. He did say that he would not tolerate bullying. He hasn’t tolerated bullying. It is not his belief that Priti Patel is a bully.

Downing Street has indicated that the full report into Patel’s conduct would not be published in order to protect those who gave evidence.

Downing Street did not deny the report, with a No. 10 spokesman instead saying: As you would expect, the Prime Minister spoke to Sir Alex Allan to further his understanding of the report. Sir Alex’s conclusions are entirely his own.

Shadow home office minister Holly Lynch said the initial, unedited report must be published in full and called for an independent investigation. These are serious allegations that suggest Boris Johnson tried to interfere with an investigation into bullying accusations against one of his closest political allies, the Labour MP said.

Allan found Patel had not always treated civil servants with consideration and respect and concluded that her approach on occasions amounted to behaviour that can be described as bullying in terms of the impact felt by individuals.

He said Patel had not consistently met the high standards required by the ministerial code, though he said there was no evidence that she was aware of the impact of her behaviour.

The home secretary apologised and said there were no excuses for what happened but highlighted the report’s assessment of her awareness. She told the BBC that any upset that I’ve caused is completely unintentional and at the time, of course it says it’s in the report, that issues were not pointed out to me.

Later on, Rutnam released a statement through the FDA union for civil servants saying that he was at no stage asked to contribute evidence to the investigation.